Current athletes have a higher left ventricular mass than non-athletes; this difference is statistically significant because P value is less than 0.001. However, this increase in mass is not permanent, because the left ventricular masses of ex-athletes and non-athletes are not significantly different (P value is greater than 0.05).
left ventricular mass than non-athletes; this difference is
Current athletes have a higher left ventricular mass than non-athletes; this difference is statistically significant because P value is less than 0.001. However, this increase in mass is not permanent, because the left ventricular masses of ex-athletes and non-athletes are not significantly different (P value is greater than 0.05).
statistically significant because P value is less than 0.001. However, this increase in mass is not
Current athletes have a higher left ventricular mass than non-athletes; this difference is statistically significant because P value is less than 0.001. However, this increase in mass is not permanent, because the left ventricular masses of ex-athletes and non-athletes are not significantly different (P value is greater than 0.05).
permanent, because the left ventricular masses of ex-athletes and non-athletes are not
Current athletes have a higher left ventricular mass than non-athletes; this difference is statistically significant because P value is less than 0.001. However, this increase in mass is not permanent, because the left ventricular masses of ex-athletes and non-athletes are not significantly different (P value is greater than 0.05).
significantly different (P value is greater than 0.05).
Researchers used echocardiography, a sonogram of the heart, to estimate the mass of the left ventricle in current athletes, non-athletes, and ex-athletes. The data are graphed below (∗∗∗ means P<0.001, and the P value comparing non-athletes and ex-athletes is >0.05). What conclusion can be drawn from the graph?