Cellphones have become one of the primary ways that families communicate with
each other, and that makes them vital for parents and children alike. Yet many school
administrators continue to enforce policies that ban them from being used in schools,
falsely citing their disruptive potential. Anyone who would stand in the way of families
communicating with each other does not have the best interests of students in mind.
How does the author's use of flawed logic affect the argument?
3
2
1
It oversimplifies administrators' arguments against cellphones and attacks
them for harming families, which is clearly not their intent.
It fails to present any supporting statistics about how many schools
enforce policies against using cellphones in schools.
It requires readers to accept that cellphones are a primary way that
families communicate, which is unlikely to be accurate.