1. A term of an online contract will not be binding on a customer if it consisted of "fine print" that could not be viewed in its entirety from the main page of the site. That rule was stated in a. Kanitz v Rogers Cable Inc.b. Doctor's Association Inc v QIP Holders.c. Rudder v Microsoft.d. Crookes v Newton.e. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v Canadian Association of Internet Provider.
2. Which of the following business arrangements might not involve an agency relationship?a. joint ventureb. strategic alliancec. distributorship d. stockbrokere. single transaction arm's length sales contract between two businesses
3. Kamil created an electronic contract with Rogers Cable Inc.
That contract contained a paragraph that purported to allow the company to change the terms of the agreement by
(i) sending a letter through the mail to Kamil,
(ii) sending an email to Kamil, or
(iii) posting a notice of the changes on its website.
Which of the following statements is TRUE?
a.Regardless of the precise wording of the paragraph, Rogers cannot change the terms of the agreement unless it ensures that Kamil actually became aware of the change.
b.As long as Kamil agreed to the terms of the contract as a whole, he will certainly be bound by every term in that contract, even if he did not actually read the entire document.
c.Regardless of the precise wording of the paragraph, Rogers can vary the terms of its agreement with Kamil only if it acts in a way that would satisfy the reasonable person.
d.Rogers can rely on the paragraph as long as it took reasonable steps to draw Kamil's attention to it before the contract was created.
e. Because of the risk that companies may take advantage of consumers, Rogers must provide Kamil with a hard copy of a letter that explains the changes to the agreement.