Respuesta :
The framers did not include an executive or federal court system because many of them shared the same fears that so many other Americans had: that too big of a central government will wreak havoc on liberties in the same way the British government did. Because of this, they played it safe, gave minimal power to the federal government, and excluded an executive branch and federal court system. 10. What would you consider to be the strengths & weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation? Strengths ●Gave the people what they wanted ●Showed the unselfishness and pure intentions of the framers (they did not make themselves nobility, president, etc.) ●Gave people around the world a taste of a new type of large-scale democracy Weaknesses ●The federal government was completely ineffective ●A national military was nearly impossible ●Discord between the states ran high ●The federal government’s inability to tax severely limited its ability to carry out functions such as paying off war debts and supporting the developing infrastructure .
The framers of the Articles decided not to include an executive branch or a federal court system because they did not create an executive branch out of concern for the concentration of power in too few hands.
Do you think this was good idea or a bad idea?
the Articles' architects decided against including an executive branch or a federal court system because it would divert attention from free and independent states. The natural balance of the just established government was upset, so this was also a bad idea. Without an executive branch and a federal judicial system, the overall government's structure is unequal and broken, which is regrettably the opposite of what they first intended.
consequences: The national government had no way of implementing or enforcing its legislative decisions.
The Constitutional Parliament was granted little authority, which choked the federal government. The Articles granted Congress the authority to enact laws, but not the authority to carry out those laws. A state might choose to disregard a federal legislation if it did not agree with it. Congress lacked the authority to impose taxes or control trade. These laws could not be enforced either without a federal judicial system or executive authority. Additionally, a unanimous vote would be necessary in order to amend the Articles of Confederation, which would be quite challenging.
What is executive branch?
The executive, often known as the executive branch or the executive authority, is the branch of government in charge of upholding the rule of law and overseeing the administration of a state.
Power is divided across many branches (executive, legislative, and judicial) in political systems founded on the idea of separation of powers in an effort to prevent the consolidation of power in the hands of a single group of people. In such a system, the executive does not enact or interpret laws (those functions belong to the legislature) (the role of the judiciary). Instead, the executive carries out the law as it has been created by the legislative and adjudicated by the courts. A decree or executive order, for example, may have come from the executive. Often, executive bureaucracies are the source.
What does Articles mean?
Articles here means articles of confederation. On November 15, 1777, the Continental Congress approved the Articles of Confederation. This text functioned as the first constitution of the United States. It lasted from March 1, 1781, until the current Constitution took effect in 1789.
The confederacy of the former 13 colonies was dubbed "The United States of America" in the Articles of Confederation, which served as the country's first constitution. The 13 articles that made up the Articles of Confederation granted authority to a federal government headed by Congress.
Supporting answer
To learn more about executive branch here https://brainly.com/question/14833917
#SPJ2
