The personal and emotional appeal stories lacks a lot of facts and evidence . Therefore, option (b): facts and evidence is the correct answer.
Due to their ability to control an audience's emotions, emotional appeals are seen as fallacies or errors in reasoning.
Because the emphasis is on evoking emotion, these appeals frequently make broad, generic assertions and provide scant factual support, making it difficult to independently verify their underlying claims.
A few facts might be included, but they might be misinformation or taken out of context. Nevertheless, the chosen facts give the argument a flimsy air of rationality.
For example: In propaganda tactics meant to incite hatred and fear, Hilter made bogus "facts" about Jews.
While it is feasible to dispute facts, it is challenging to refute an emotional appeal; there is really no true way to refute an emotional argument.
Check out the link below to learn about emotional-personal stories;
https://brainly.com/question/27325379
#SPJ5
