PLATO!!!!! HELP!!!!!Robert Bork wrote an article opposing a Supreme Court decision about ruling on married couples because he said there was no right to privacy in the Constitution. What is his style of interpretation called? A. private intent B. original review C. living intent D. judicial review E. original intent
Bork, simply, believed that unless the Founders declared something to be true, it was not Constitutional. So, if the Founders wanted a right to privacy, they would have explicitly stated it.
This style of interpretation is known as "original intent." Original intent refers to a type of interpretation in which a judge tries to understand what the original purpose of the Founding Fathers was when they created the Constitution. Judges who take this attitude believe that understanding the original intent of a law will help them to better apply the law in the present.
