Is it possible to reject the notion of 'intrinsic value' as fuzzy and radically subject to individual opinion, and rely only on what has 'extrinsic value' since questions about what has what kind of consequences can be settled concretely?

Respuesta :

talmax
Iiiiiiiiisbsbssmskkskskjsksjdndjdhdhdhehsusu

The intrinsic price of something is stated to be the fee that that factor has “in itself,” or “for its personal sake,” or “as such,” or “in its own right.” Extrinsic price is a fee that isn't always intrinsic. Many philosophers take an intrinsic fee to be important to a ramification of ethical judgments.

What are the things that have intrinsic cost and that have something to do with our morality?

All predominant normative ethical theories discover something as being intrinsically precious. For instance, for a distinctive feature ethicist, Eudaimonia (human flourishing, every so often translated as "happiness") has an intrinsic fee, whereas things that carry you happiness (including having a circle of relatives) may be simply instrumentally valuable.

Intrinsic cost is the fee that an entity has in itself, for what it's far, or as a cease. The contrasting kind of fee is an instrumental fee. Instrumental cost is the value that something has as a means to a favored or valued cease.

Learn more about Intrinsic costs here: https://brainly.com/question/25109150

#SPJ2