amadogarcia347
contestada

Why did suburbs tend to have little diversity?
A. Jim Crow laws in northern Suburbs prevented minorities from
moving in.
B. Only minority families could afford to buy a house in the suburbs.
C. Only white families could afford to buy a house in the suburbs.
D. The government only gave government assistance to buy houses
to white families.

Respuesta :

prisonnightmare

Answer:

C. Only white families could afford to buy a house in the suburbs.

Explanation:

A is incorrect because it technically did not ever place a "ban" on specific races being able to move into suburbs, all it did was segregate whites and blacks in schools, public places, etc.

B is incorrect because minority groups were often discriminated against pay wise and job eligibility wise, so it would not make sense that they would be the only ones that could afford housing in suburbs.

C is correct because white families were the only "group" that could afford the housing because they were least discriminated against in a work environment back in the 1960s.

D is incorrect because it just doesn't make sense, I do not believe the government has any housing financial aid in the 1960s in general.

Hopefully this helps!

srastiuts023

Why did suburbs tend to have little diversity beacuse C. Only white families could afford to buy a house in the suburbs.

What changed into the purpose of the constrained variety inside the suburbs?

Explaination: The reason for this many African Americans had low-profit jobs and Whites had better earnings jobs based on their skin tone and popularity around the globe.

Are suburbs more numerous than cities?

while suburbs continue to be relatively less numerous than metropolis centers, the beyond two a long time throughout the worldwide North, each significant city and outer suburbs were going via giant exchange in terms of which groups stay where.

Learn more about Suburbs at https://brainly.com/question/1164653

#SPJ2