Answer:
The nutritionist have enough evidence to reject the writer’s claim .
Step-by-step explanation:
Claim : The average number of calories in a serving of popcorn is different from 75
Null hypothesis : [tex]H_0:\mu \neq 75[/tex]
Alternate hypothesis : [tex]H_a:\mu = 75[/tex]
n = 20
Sample standard deviation s = 7
[tex]\bar{x}=78[/tex]
Since n < 30 and population standard deviation is not given .
So, we will use t - test .
Formula : [tex]t = \frac{x-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]
Substitute the values
[tex]t = \frac{78-75}{\frac{7}{\sqrt{20}}}[/tex]
[tex]t = 1.9166[/tex]
So, t calculated = 1.9166
Degree of freedom = n-1 = 20-1 = 19
Refer the t table
So, [tex]t_{(\frac{\alpha}{2},df)}=t_{(\frac{0.05}{2},19)}=2.093[/tex]
Since t critical > t calculated
So, we are fail to reject the null hypothesis .
So, the nutritionist do not have enough evidence to reject the writer’s claim .