Experts have linked the increase in teen car accidents to an increase in the use of social media while driving. Teen drivers are using social media to take selfies while driving. This behavior causes dangerous driving situations that may result in deadly accidents. The only way to stop teen accidents caused by distracted driving is to block social media apps while a car is in motion.

Which statement best explains why this is an example of fallacious reasoning?

The author fails to recognize other behaviors that cause distracted driving.
The author uses language that unfairly draws upon the emotions of readers.
The author labels teens as distracted which is an unfair judgment.
The author fails to include relevant and sufficient evidence.

The statement only describes social media, and car accidents, but does not take any other behavior that is also present. Thus, option A is correct.

What is fallacious reasoning?

Fallacious reasoning means when a person only describes a certain point of view, and all the other points that can also be considered are not taken into account.

In this statement, the author only talks about how distracted drivers are. All are teens, always on social media and taking selfies. and we should ban the use of social media.

But all the other factors that cause accidents like driving after having alcohol consumption, and carelessness are not being taken into account. That makes his statement fallacious reasoning. Therefore, option A is the correct option.

Learn more about fallacious reasoning, here:

https://brainly.com/question/26867960

#SPJ2