Professional football is the modern day equivalent of the Roman gladiatorial games. Therefore, since it was expected that gladiators would kill their opponents, no one should complain if professional football players injure or kill their opponents.

Based on the information provided within the question this statement is an example of Inductive Reasoning. This is a reasoning method in which varying statements are used in order to supply some sort of evidence for proving the validity of a specific conclusion. In this scenario the author is comparing Modern Day Football with Roman Gladiator games, since there is a comparison he states that killing opponents can be a similarity as well.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

scouteo scouteo · Answer 2 · 2019-10-07T23:00:49+02:00

The correct answer is A) inductive, weak.

The sentence reads: Professional football is the modern-day equivalent of the Roman gladiatorial games. Therefore, since it was expected that gladiators would kill their opponents, no one should complain if professional football players injure or kill their opponents.

Professional football is a sport and a big business. The above induction is a limited comparison because in no way this sport is aimed to cause damage in any way to the opponent. Is a competitive sport that has a lot of audience due to its strategic and competitive nature that attract the masses. There is no valid argument that compares it with Roman Gladiators games.

The other options if the question were B) deductive, valid. C) Deductive, invalid. D) Deductive, cogent. E) Inductive, strong.