Respuesta :
Answer:
The scientist’s conclusion is not appropriate because it is based on a subjective appreciation (“significantly greater than”).
How “greater” is “significantly greater”?
A more objective and technical approach would be fixing a level of significance, let's say 0.05 or 0.01 for example, measuring the samples means and standard deviations and then proceeding with an appropriate hypothesis testing in order to see if the differences in means are really significant.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The experiment lacked a control group that did not use any fertilizer.
Step-by-step explanation:
A control group is a group that is identical in every way to all experimental groups except that the control group is not subjected to any treatment. This is done in order to have a standard against which all experimental groups are compared. When no control group is included in an experiment, the scientist cannot know whether the treatment actually had an effect on the experimental groups.