The national percent of adults who have a laptop computer is 62%. In San Francisco, a simple random sample of 100 adults is taken and 69% of these adults have a laptop. Is this strong evidence that more adults in SF have laptops than the national average?

a) State the null hypothesis and the alternative in terms of a box model.
b) Find z and p values.
c) What do you conclude?

Respuesta :

Answer:

a) Null hypothesis:[tex]p\leq 0.62[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p > 0.62[/tex]  

b) [tex]z=\frac{0.69 -0.62}{\sqrt{\frac{0.62(1-0.62)}{100}}}=1.442[/tex]  

[tex]p_v =P(Z>1.442)=0.235[/tex]  

c) The p value obtained was a high low value and using the significance level assumed for example [tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] we have [tex]p_v>\alpha[/tex] so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of adults who have a laptop is not significantly higher than 0.62 .  

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

n=100 represent the random sample taken

X represent the adults that have a laptop

[tex]\hat p=0.69[/tex] estimated proportion of adults that have a laptop

[tex]p_o=0.62[/tex] is the value that we want to test

[tex]\alpha[/tex] represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value (variable of interest)  

2) Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim the proportion is higher than 0.62 the national proportion:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]p\leq 0.62[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p > 0.62[/tex]  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

[tex]z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}[/tex] (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion [tex]\hat p[/tex] is significantly different from a hypothesized value [tex]p_o[/tex].

3) Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

[tex]z=\frac{0.69 -0.62}{\sqrt{\frac{0.62(1-0.62)}{100}}}=1.442[/tex]  

4) Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:  

[tex]p_v =P(Z>1.442)=0.235[/tex]  

The p value obtained was a high low value and using the significance level assumed for example [tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] we have [tex]p_v>\alpha[/tex] so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of adults who have a laptop is not significantly higher than 0.62 . Â