Answer:
Null hypothesis: [tex]\mu_{2002}\leq 3.15[/tex]
Alternative hypothesis :[tex]\mu_{2002} > 3.15[/tex]
C. The mean Rutgers College GPA has increased to more than 3.15
Step-by-step explanation:
Data given and notation
[tex]\bar X_{2000}=3.15[/tex] represent the average score for Rutgers College in 2000
[tex]\bar X_{2002}=3.46[/tex] represent the average score for Rutgers College in 2002
[tex]s_{2000}[/tex] represent the sample standard deviation in 2000
[tex]s_{2002}[/tex] represent the sample standard deviation in 2002
[tex]n[/tex] sample size
State the null and alternative hypotheses. .
What are H0 and Ha for this study?
Null hypothesis: [tex]\mu_{2002}\leq 3.15[/tex]
Alternative hypothesis :[tex]\mu_{2002} > 3.15[/tex]
For this case we need to take in count that the alternative hypothesis can't have and = sign, and based on the information a good hypothesis here would be if the average GPA increased between 2000 and 2002, so based on this the best option for this case would be:
C. The mean Rutgers College GPA has increased to more than 3.15