Rodrigo wanted to buy his wife a pearl necklace for her birthday. Murphy's Jewelry had a necklace he liked for $139, but he bought the same necklace at Pearls for Her. This pearl necklace was originally $173.75, but was on sale for 20% off, which reduced the price to $139. He was very pleased with his bargain. Rodrigo is subject to: overconfidence. overvaluing the present relative to the future. a sunk cost fallacy. a framing bias.

Respuesta :

Answer:

a framing bias.

Explanation:

In this scenario, Rodrigo is subject to a framing bias. This bias explains how people's decisions are affected by how situations , words or settings are framed. Even though price at both stores are the same, Pearls for Her store created a relativism factor; it showed a higher original price and a 20% discount which makes Rodrigo think that he'a getting a bargain hence making him lean more towards actually buying the necklace there and not at Murphy's Jewelry store.