Answer:
While both speeches rely on logical evidence to support their reasons and claims, they differ quite substantially in how they use this evidence. Chamberlain uses logical evidence, pointing to what may happen to the empire if the status quo were to change. He also relies on anecdotal evidence, specifically his personal stories as a soldier, to try to convince his audience that his claims are true. Nehru, on the other hand, uses some logical evidence, but mostly relies on appeals to support his claim. Nehru leans heavily on pathos, or emotional appeals. He talks of a bright future, stirring his audience’s desire for independence. Nehru claims that, through hard work, an independent India could be great for each and every citizen.xplanation:
Chamberlain and Nehru both allure for the apprehensions of their crowd, however Chamberlain is interesting to a longing for civil rights, while Nehru is interesting to a craving for control over others.
The comparison and contrast between the Chamberlain and Nehru’s speeches as:
The two speeches depend on intelligent proof to help their reasons and claims, they contrast significantly by they way they utilize this proof as shown below:
Chamberlain and Nehru both enticement for the monetary interests of their crowd, however Chamberlain is interesting to a longing for power, while Nehru is interesting to a feeling of civil rights in their speeches. As the comparision and contrast between the speeches is shown above with its evidence.
For more information, refer the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/14660789
