Answer:
B. The portfolio should be reallocated based on their stated investment objective, reducing the cash and bond percentage by 50% and using the proceeds to buy a small or mid-cap growth mutual fund
Explanation:
Since this couple has stated investment goal of development with moderate hazard, a portfolio that just has about 25% values and that has 75% fixed pay protections is improper - since it will give pay; yet little development. The long haul bond and money designation ought to be decreased and supplanted with development stocks to more readily adjust the portfolio. Decision C is unreasonably theoretical for a "preservationist financial specialist." Choice D is to some degree valid since this couple is putting resources into their manager's stock - yet since the stock just speaks to 8% of the client's all out portfolio, this isn't a too much enormous rate.