Which of the following is not a reason that small societies can maintain stability in the long term better than larger societies?
a.
Smaller societies have a smaller demand for resources.
b.
Smaller societies can be governed by internal controls more effectively than larger societies.
c.
Smaller societies rely more heavily on legislation and military forces.
d.
None of the above

Respuesta :

A society of a few to several people living by foraging wild foods, herding domesticated animals, or non-intensive horticulture on the village level. It is not true that These rely more heavily on legislation and military forces.

What are the main advantage of smaller societies?

Living in a smaller society have many advantages like the use of less residential area, the people being close to each other, having a helping hand from everyone in the society, etc.

Smaller societies can maintain stability in the long term better than larger societies as:

  • Smaller societies needs a smaller demand for resources.
  • Smaller societies are governed by internal controls more effectively than larger societies.
  • Do not need heavy legislation and military forces.

Thus, the correct option is C.

For more details regarding small society, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14526578

#SPJ2