Which detail best supports the idea that princes who
do not destroy or occupy their principalities will not
keep them?
"The Spartans held Athens and Thebes,
establishing there an oligarchy."
"The Romans, in order to hold Capua, Carthage,
and Numantia, dismantled them."
"They wished to hold Greece as the Spartans held
it, making it free and permitting its laws."
"He who becomes master of a city accustomed to
freedom and does not destroy it, may expect to be
destroyed by it."

The detail that best supports the idea that princes who do not destroy their principalities is B. “The Romans, in order to hold Capua, Carthage, and Numantia, dismantled them.”

What is a Supporting Detail?

This refers to the use of evidence to show that a claim is valid and this can either be with the use of factual or statistical evidence.

Hence, we can see that the original claim that a prince who does not destroy or occupy their principalities will not keep them is backed up with the evidence that “The Romans, in order to hold Capua, Carthage, and Numantia, dismantled them.”

Read more about shttps://brainly.com/question/884525upporting details here