Respuesta :
Answer:
With reference to the Case stated above about "Surrogate verses Father", I think the genetic link should carry more weight than who gestates it when determining the custody of the child.
This is based on the existing florida law which specifies the type of method to be adopted for bearing children by a surrogate mother (That is, traditional surrogacy or Gestational Surrogacy).
Why I agreed with the Florida Law was because the connection between the parents who sort the services of the surrogate lady is far paramount than surrogate lady who simply serves as a gestation environment. The genetic link and features like the facial features of the child, the blood group, the skin colour, the personality traits of the child (introverted child or extroverted child ) are more important and helps in determining the child's custody.
Explanation:
The Florida Surrogacy Law sided with the Surrogate mother, and termed biological Father as only sperm donor, which is wrong observation by the court.
Surrogate verses Father
In this case Father used traditional Surrogacy method, which Florida Surrogacy Law observed Father's contribution as only a sperm donor.
I disagree with the Florida law because it neglects the two important case in points. Firstly it neglected the kind of relation surrogate woman had with the child, it was mainly monetary relation rather than a mother and child relation, secondly Florida Law refused to believe Father's love and it's emotional attachement to the child.
Thus, when determining the Custody of Child who gestates carry more weight rather than genetic links.
Learn more about Surrogacy here:
https://brainly.com/question/7220263
