Vadlyalume1
contestada

Which evidence best supports Curtis's opinion that
Dred Scott should be free because he lived in a free
territory? Check all that apply.

A. The constitution refers to slaves as ''person held to service in one state''

B. The convection which framed the constitution.....has...the power to regulate commerce

C. A citizen of the United States owns slaves in Cuba

D. Does this legislation deprive him of his property without due process of law?

E. Acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the Territory of Wisconsin...were constitution and vaild laws.

Respuesta :

unicornbutt3

Answer:

A. The constitution refers to slaves as ''person held to service in one state''

E. Acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the Territory of Wisconsin...were constitution and vaild laws.

Explanation: right on edg

The evidence that best supports Curtis's opinion that Dred Scott should be free because he lived in a free territory are :

A. The constitution refers to slaves as ''person held to service in one state''.

E. Acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the Territory of Wisconsin...were constitution and valid laws.

  • The evidence that best supports Curtis's opinion that Dred Scott should be free because he lived in a free territory are that the constitution refers to slaves as ''person held to service in one state''.
  • It Acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the Territory of Wisconsin were constitution and valid laws.

Therefore, the correct answer is A and E.

Learn more :

https://brainly.com/question/12062046?referrer=searchResults

Otras preguntas