3. PART A: What does the term “affrays” most likely mean as used in paragraph 2?
A. misunderstandings
B. debates
C. disputes
D. divisions

PART B: Which of the following phrases from paragraph 2 best supports the answer to Part A?
A. “the judgment of the Courts”
B. “similar scandals”
C. “for three generations”
D. “The neighbour feud”

Paragraph 2

The forest lands of Gradwitz were of wide extent
and well stocked with game; the narrow strip of
precipitous2 woodland that lay on its outskirt was
not remarkable for the game it harboured3 or the shooting it afforded, but it was the most jealously guarded of all its owner's territorial possessions. A famous law suit, in the days of his grandfather, had wrested it from the illegal possession of a neighbouring family of petty landowners; the dispossessed party had never acquiesced4 in the judgment of the Courts, and a long series of poaching affrays and similar scandals had embittered the relationships between the families for three generations. The neighbour feud had grown into a personal one since Ulrich had come to be head of his family; if there was a man in the world whom he detested and wished ill to it was Georg Znaeym, the inheritor of the quarrel and the tireless game-snatcher and raider of the disputed border-forest. The feud might, perhaps, have died down or been compromised if the personal ill-will of the two men had not stood in the way; as boys they had thirsted for one another's blood, as men each prayed that misfortune might fall on the other, and this wind-scourged winter night Ulrich had banded together his foresters to watch the dark forest, not in quest of four-footed quarry, but to keep a look-out for the prowling thieves whom he suspected of being afoot from across the land boundary. The roebuck, which usually kept in the sheltered hollows during a storm-wind, were running like driven things to-night, and there was movement and unrest among the creatures that were wont to sleep through the dark hours. Assuredly there was a disturbing element in the forest, and Ulrich could guess the quarter from whence it came.

From Paragraph 2, the passage talks about a neighbour feud between two families of Mr Ulrich and Mr Georg Znaeym because of the shared territory both families used in hunting game. The two men had personal egos that either of them refused to let go of, even though the land they both have disagreements over was recently won from a law suit against illegal occupants.

The term "poaching affray" means the dispute both men had as regards to who will shpptshoot what animal and what territory belonged to the other for hunting.