Respuesta :
Answer:
No, The women were not justified in hiding the evidence.
Explanation:
In the book, "Trifles", by Susan Glaspell, she narrates a murder incident involving a couple. The couple were Mr. and Mrs. John Wright. John Wright was described as a temperamental man who subdued his wife. Mrs. Wright had just been arrested by the police for the suspicious murder of her husband. Two police officers, accompanied by their wives, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters came to the house to investigate the scene and collect evidence. The women came to the house with the intention of bringing a change of clothes for Mrs. Wright who was now in custody. There, they found evidence that Mrs. Wright likely killed her husband.
One of the pieces of evidence was the wrung neck of Mrs. Wrights canary which they believed was killed by Mr. Wright. They were thus convinced that Mrs Wright was being ill treated by Mr. Wright prompting her to kill her husband. They then conceal the evidence from their husbands.
Though this act was out of compassion for the woman, it was wrong for the following reasons;
- The law is supposed to take its course.
- Mrs Wright was supposed to seek help or annul the marriage when it was being detrimental to her rather than resort to murder which is an offence to the law.
- A lawyer would have also helped Mrs. Wright even if the evidence was submitted.
- Not submitting the evidence also makes it seem like the women supported the crime.
No, The woman were not justified sequestered from everything the proof.
In the book, "Trifles", by Susan Glaspell, she portrays a homicide episode including a couple. The couple were Mr. and Mrs. John Wright.
- John Wright was portrayed as a volatile man who repressed his significant other.
- Mrs. Wright had recently been captured by the police for the dubious homicide of her significant other.
- Two cops, joined by their spouses, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters went to the house to research the scene and gather proof.
- The ladies went to the house fully intent on bringing a difference in garments for Mrs. Wright who was currently in care. There, they found proof that Mrs. Wright probably killed her better half.
- One of the bits of proof was the wrung neck of Mrs. Wrights canary which they accepted was killed by Mr. Wright.
- They were in this way persuaded that Mrs Wright was as a rule abused by Mr. Wright inciting her to kill her significant other. They then, at that point, hide the proof from their spouses.
However this demonstration was out of empathy for the women, it was off-base for the accompanying reasons;
- The law should follow through to its logical end.
- Mrs Wright should look for help or abrogate the marriage when it was being unfavorable to her as opposed to falling back on murder which is an offense to the law.
- An attorney would have likewise helped Mrs. Wright regardless of whether the proof was submitted.
- Not presenting the proof additionally causes it to seem like the womens upheld the wrongdoing.
For more information, refer the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/14639247
