Answer:
This argument illustrates the ad hominem fallacy because it's mainly focused on a guy named John Doe, rather than the issue at hand. It's saying that since John supports this cause, considering the fact he's done bad stuff in the past, it automatically makes this cause terrible. This fallacy makes the argument weak because it's very biased, and doesn't talk about any facts on why the light rail itself is a bad idea.
Explanation:
In the lesson, you will see that it tells you that the ad hominem fallacy is basically a form of persuasion attacks a person associated with an issue in order to cast doubts upon said person.
It also explains to you that a fallacy is false reasoning that makes an argument invalid.
If you use my answer as a reference, make sure to put it into your own words, and that you understand what you're saying.
Answer:
This argument illustrates the ad hominem fallacy because it's mainly focused on a guy named John Doe rather than the issue at hand. It's saying that since John supports this cause, considering the fact he's done bad stuff in the past it automatically makes this cause terrible. This fallacy makes the argument weak because it's very biased and doesn't talk about any facts on why the light rail itself is a bad idea.
Explanation:
