"Sippy was thinking of buying Christich’s house. Henoticed watermarks on the ceiling, but the agentshowing the house stated that the roof had beenrepaired and was in good condition. Sippy was nottold that the roof still leaked and that the repairs hadnot been able to stop the leaking. Sippy bought thehouse. Some time later, heavy rains caused water toleak into the house, and Sippy claimed that Christichwas liable for damages. What theory would he relyon? Decide. [Sippy v. Christich, 609 P.2d 204(Kan. App.)"