contestada


1. Compare the views of Bradstreet and Johnson toward American Indians.

2. Explain how Indian perceptions of the relationship between the two groups differ.

Respuesta :

Answer:

To begin with, Colonel John Bradstreet starts his statement off by calling the American Indians "savages", the "less useful, and "greatest villains". You can infer that Bradstreet does not like or want a relationship with the American Indians at all. In his statement he emphasizes how the Indians are defenseless, and that they are raising jealousy. I can tell that Bradstreet does not like the encounters with the Indians, nor think they are helpful people. Williams Johnson starts his statement off with saying that the colonist had the wrong idea about the Indians and that they " greatly dispised them" without even knowing their power or knowledge of these lands. He wanted a bond with the Indians that were beneficial; he also believed that the Indians had their own way of living and that they were useful. 

The two perceptions are completely different. Bradstreet has a negative perception of the Indians the whole throughout the whole statement. He believes that the Indians are not a ally, but more of an enemy. Johnson on the other hand believes that the colonist hasn't gave the Indians a chance to show them their knowledge. He also believes that the Indians could be allies, and not enemy's. 

Explanation:

On Edge 2020.

Answer:

Johnson and Bradstreet thought that the American Indians were a threat to the settlers. Johnson believed that American Indians could be harmful to Britain. Bradstreet believed that American Indians were savages and the enemy. Johnson believes that the Indians seem to be the enemy, but they have to be given a chance. He thinks that they could possibly be allies. While on the other hand, Bradstreet completely think the worst of the Natives. He thinks that the Natives are the enemy and doesn't want to create any type of relationship with them.

Explanation: