Suppose you were a manager charged with conserving the collared lizards of the Ozark Mountains. One of your jobs might be to reintroduce the lizards into glades in which they have gone extinct. When reintroducing lizards to a glade, you have the choice of using a single population from a single glade or using multiple populations from multiple glades. What would be the evolutionary consequences of each choice, for both the donor and the recipient populations? Which strategy would you follow? Why?

We should first add a single established glade community to return the lizards into another canyon through which they have disappeared or extinguished, and the added group will induce a decline in the size of the gives consumers and just as the population was becoming minimal, there will possibly be another genetic glow at every and genetic variation would become prevalent.
Thru all the genetic drift, anyone will arbitrarily correct the alleles, as well as the heterozygosity, would spiral out of control. The heterozygosity including its target population was already comparable or otherwise less than those of the target population, which would support us to maintain the particular genotype including its sample chosen.
The inclusion of multiple donor populations would not have a substantial impact on the magnitude of every other donor population, resulting in a recipient community with greater allelic variation as well as heterozygosity than those of the population frame, although there is a risk of losing individual genotypes thereby sacrificing that sense that the separate donor population has established to their specific setting.
I would like to implement that the very first approach, since the genotype including its sample of the population is retained.