Respuesta :
Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901, keeping rural districts in power.
Further Explanation:
Baker V. Carr was a landmark decision made by the Supreme court of the United States in which court held that redistricting qualifies as equal as justiciable question and that ruling enabled federal courts to hear redistricting cases. This case came into effect when a lawsuit was filed against the State of Tennessee as it did not conduct any redistricting from the last 61 years. The counter from Tennessee came as that the composition of the legislative districts did constitute a political question. Associate Justice, William J. Brennan along with other five other justices stated that redistricting never qualifies as a political question and he also remanded the case to the federal district court for future proceedings. Initially, the verdict of this case did not have any major impact on the electoral districts but the verdict itself set an important precedent with regards to the powers provided to the federal courts in order to address redistricting.
Learn More:
1. Which step in the scientific method requires you to use your senses to obtain information?
https://brainly.com/question/1404770
2. How can the government ensure that the youth do not find themselves poverty-stricken in the future?
https://brainly.com/question/5091509
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Chapter:Baker V. Carr
Subject: History
Keywords: Baker, Carr, Supreme Court, Legislative Districts, Lawsuit, Federal, District, Powers, Federal courts, Justice, William J. Brennan, Initially.
Answer:
Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901, keeping rural districts in power.
