Yet the men who framed this declaration were great men—high in literary acquirements—high in their sense of honor, and incapable of asserting principles inconsistent with those on which they were acting.

–Dred Scott v. Sandford,
Supreme Court of the United States

How does Taney use this appeal to emotion to support his argument?

The appeal praises the virtues of the writers of the document Taney uses as evidence.
The appeal relies on his original claim that Dred Scott is not a citizen and cannot sue in a federal court.
The appeal counters Taney’s claim that people’s origins dictate their status in the community.
The appeal creates doubt about the validity and soundness of the Constitution in terms of defining citizenship.

Respuesta :

Answer:

The appeal praises the virtues of the writers of the document Taney uses as evidence.

Explanation:

I'm right againnnn

The way Taney use this appeal to emotion to support his argument is:

  • A. The appeal praises the virtues of the writers of the document Taney uses as evidence.

Pathos

This refers to the appeal to emotion which is usually used as a persuasive tool to get someone to do something.

With this in mind, we can see that pathos is used by Taney as he praises the virtues of the writers of the document which he is using as evidence.

Read more about emotional appeal here:
https://brainly.com/question/540796