Which best describes one main difference between Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring and John Muir’s "Save the Redwoods"?

Carson is concerned about the destruction of the entire environment, while Muir is only concerned about a certain part of the environment.
Carson speaks of a possible future, while Muir discusses only what has happened in the past.
Carson believes that the past was just as bad as the present, while Muir believes that the present is worse than the past.
Carson offers facts and evidence to support her argument, while Muir appeals to readers’ emotions mostly through a fictional account.

This Answer Would Be A - Carson is concerned about the destruction of the entire environment, while Muir is only concerned about a certain part of the environment

I Hope This Helps You!!! :)

Answer Link

Martebi Martebi · Answer 2 · 2021-11-30T17:37:01+01:00

The best description of one main difference between Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring and John Muir’s "Save the Redwoods is that Carson is concerned about the destruction of the entire environment, while Muir is only concerned about a certain part of the environment.

Rachel Carson was known to be an American biologist who is popular for her writings on environmental pollution and the natural history of the sea.

She wrote a book called the Silent Spring in 1962 and it then became one of the most influential books in the modern environmental movement.

It gave a thorough description for tighter control of pesticides, including DDT.

Learn more from

https://brainly.com/question/507273