Ms. Urbanski kept a pistol in her home as protection against intruders. One evening, she heard a noise in the den and went to investigate. Upon entering the room, she saw a man stealing her television. The burglar, seeing the gun, ran for the window, but Ms. Urbanski fired and killed him before he could escape. In a trial for manslaughter, Ms. Urbanski pleaded self-defense. Would you find her guilty? Why or why not?

Question

23-02-2021
Law

contestada

Ms. Urbanski kept a pistol in her home as protection against intruders. One evening, she heard a noise in the den and went to investigate. Upon entering the room, she saw a man stealing her television. The burglar, seeing the gun, ran for the window, but Ms. Urbanski fired and killed him before he could escape. In a trial for manslaughter, Ms. Urbanski pleaded self-defense. Would you find her guilty? Why or why not?

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

A Recognize a problem C. Test the hypothesis with an experiment B Form a hypothesis D. Draw conclusions 1 Dana wanted to know how synthetic fibers were differen

6.(01.05 LC) Which states of matter change shape when moved?(2 points) Gases and solids Liquids and gases Liquids, solids, and gases Solids and liquids

What motivated the Spanish-American war? 100 points, will mark brainliest

Which of the following methods could be used in a scientific investigation?

What is 0.007826 converted to scientific notation

Edward’s brother has a box containing 3 chocolate donuts, 4 glazed donuts, 5 sprinkle donuts, and 3 blueberry donuts. What is the probability Edward will NOT pi

The fifth term of a geometric sequence is 32 and the eighth term is 4. (a) Find the ratio. (2 marks) (b) Find the first term. (2 marks) (C) Find the sum of the

anyone smart enough n=13 ∑ n + 15(7 - 3) k= 7

On a certain day, the company took 103 people on whale watching trips. There were 64 children aged 12 and under, of which some children were under 3 years. If

a+a+3=a+13 solve the equation

idkdeirdre idkdeirdre · Answer 1 · 2021-02-23T22:59:01+01:00

Answer:

i would find her not guilty but in most cases they would most find her not guilty and put her on a less charge. but i would say shes not gulity because the guy was breaking an entry Ms.urbanski was proberly was scared what might happen to her. and plus if she is an older women she proberly cant fight for her self even if she did an average man can most likely take down and average woman. i would also say that Ms.Urbanski didnt know if he had a gun or not so her life could of been in danger and lastly if Ms.Urbanski had a clear criminal record which would make this her first incident this could save her from being convicted

Explanation:

jayilych4real jayilych4real · Answer 2 · 2021-11-05T17:54:04+01:00

In a trial for manslaughter, Ms. Urbanski pleaded self-defense. Would you find her guilty?

Yes, I would find her guilty for manslaughter

According to the given question, we can see that a burglar invaded the home of Mrs Urbanski and she came out to investigate with her gun and when the burglar heard her coming, he tried to run away and she shot him dead.

As a result of this, I would have to say that I would find her guilty of manslaughter because she shot a defenceless man who was not coming to harm her, but trying to run away and save his life and he was shot without provocation.