contestada

As a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr, courts can require states to
-Keep voting districts the same even if the population changes.
-Change the number of voting districts within the state.
-Appoint government officials if voting districts are unfair.
-Redraw voting districts that are roughly equal in population.

Respuesta :

lolacromwell7

Answer:

As a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr, courts can require states to

  1. keep voting districts the same even if the population changes.<<< Correct
  2. change the number of voting districts within the state.
  3. appoint government officials if voting districts are unfair.
  4. redraw voting districts that are roughly equal in population.

Explanation:

Oct. 2021 Edge

Tundexi

Because of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr, the courts can require states to keep voting districts the same even if the population changes.

What is the case of Baker v. Carr?

The Supreme court ruling here is important because its established the right of federal courts to review redistricting issues.

Hence, the case ensured that courts can require states to keep voting districts the same even if the population changes.

Therefore, the Option A is correct.

Read more about Baker v. Carr

brainly.com/question/1344638

#SPJ2

Otras preguntas