Which of the following statements about classical conditioning is false?
A. The strength of conditioning depends on extent of coincidence of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.
B. In Pavlov’s paradigm where a sound becomes able to elicit salivation, the sound is the conditioned stimulus.
C. In Pavlov’s paradigm where a sound becomes able to elicit salivation, the sound is unconditioned stimulus.
D. Hebb synapses have properties that could explain the changes required for the establishment of conditioning.

Respuesta :

The letter A is it, because I had a test and it had this exact question and it was letter A

It is false that C. In Pavlov’s paradigm where a sound becomes able to elicit salivation, the sound is unconditioned stimulus.

Classical conditioning refers to a learning type where an animal or human reacts to a stimulus without thinking because they have been trained/ conditioned to do so.

There are two types of stimuli:

  • Conditioned stimulus
  • Unconditioned stimulus

An unconditioned stimulus refers to a type of stimulus that a person would normally react to in a certain way for instance:

  • Smell of food making you hungry
  • Seeing a snake making you scared

A Conditioned stimulus is not natural but rather results from you having associated a stimulus with an event so many times that you react to that stimulus in a certain way:

  • Sound making a dog hungry so much so that it salivates
  • You becoming happy when you see your mother come home from work because she usually brings treats.

In conclusion, we can say that a sound causing an animal to salivate is not unconditioned but rather conditioned because it is not natural to react to sound in that way.

For more information on conditional stimuli look at https://brainly.com/question/14310415.

Ver imagen Parrain