Respuesta :
Answer:
The notorious World Health Organization definition of health as “a state of. complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of. disease or infirmity” has been roundly, and justifiably, criticized by philosophers. more or less since it first appeared in 1948.
Explanation:
Take a look at this link it is totally safe:
https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-94-017-8706-2_48-1
For a basic intro:
Yet, philosopher Daniel Callahan took it seriously in 1973 and roundly criticized the definition for fatal overreach, arguing that to define “health” in terms of “well-being” transforms human happiness into a medical outcome and social ills like injustice, economic scarcity, and discrimination into medical problems ...
If helped mark me the brainiest!!
https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-94-017-8706-2_48-1
For a basic intro:
Yet, philosopher Daniel Callahan took it seriously in 1973 and roundly criticized the definition for fatal overreach, arguing that to define “health” in terms of “well-being” transforms human happiness into a medical outcome and social ills like injustice, economic scarcity, and discrimination into medical problems ...
If helped mark me the brainiest!!