A team of researchers is working on a project to make a new kind of carbonless fuel. During their experiment, there is an explosion that destroys the lab. While they are cleaning the debris, they discover three pieces of frozen metal. The researchers were excited to report that they had discovered a fuel that burns so clean it becomes cold. Other scientists attempt to make carbonless fuel but are unsuccessful. Which statement best explains why this scenario represents "bad" science?

A. The conditions of the experiment are not replicable or repeatable.
B. The process of making clean fuel is known due to the explosion.
C. The frozen metal was discovered through biased research practices.
D. The result of clean fuel production, the frozen metal, is not observable.

Respuesta :

This is a bad science because the conditions of the experiment are not replicable or repeatable.

It should be noted that a good science should have the following:

  • Experiments that have controlled variables.
  • Studies that have unbiased results
  • Experiments that are replicable.

Since the conditions of the experiment are not replicable or repeatable because the scientists attempted to make carbonless fuel but are unsuccessful, then this is a bad science.

In conclusion, the correct option is A.

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/24411132

Answer:

a

Explanation: