Respuesta :

Answer:

That is a slippery slope

Explanation:

Let me start by saying that I hope this is an extended response question.

So lets start with the American Civil War. There was virtually no International involvement in this war, outside of the British half-heartedly trying to run Union blockades to give the Confederates weapons and recieve Reb cotton. At the battle of Gettysburg in July of 1863, Col. William Freemantle of Her Magesties Royal Dragoons (British Special Forces) was attatched to the Confederate Army with R. E. Lee to research the idea of the British supporting the confederates with troops. The lack of international intervention allowed America to fight a war that needed fought, end slavery, and preserve the Union.

Now, look at American involvement in the Syrian Civil War (starting in 2009). Not only did we not end the war, but we created an even larger rift in the country, created a void that ISIS was able to fill, and oh, by the way, the war is still going on.

Long story short, international intervention is not always the best answer when it comes to a Civil War.

Tundexi

The international intervention are bodies that advocates for states to have an obligation to protect their inhabitants from human rights abuses such as war crimes

The international intervention can help alter the course of civil wars by:

  • Helping to terminate the civil by providing a third party capable of enforcing a peace treaty through reassuring military groups that need to disarm.

  • Extending the civil wars through shifting the distribution of power among contending factions in the civil war.

Read more about international intervention

brainly.com/question/9565844

Otras preguntas