Respuesta :
The correct option that is true as regards Wayne's situation about the lease is;
B; Leases of less than one year are not required to be in writing. However, if a lease IS in writing, then it must be signed by the lessor (in this case, Wayne).
The missing options are;
Under the Statute of Frauds in California,
A) leases of less than one year are not even required to be in writing, and therefore, signatures are not required.
B) Leases of less than one year are not required to be in writing. However, if a lease IS in writing, then it must be signed by the lessor (in this case, Wayne).
C) Leases of less than one year are not required to be in writing; but if there is a written lease, then it must be signed by both the lessee and lessor.
D) Because the property being leased is located in Northern California, a lease agreement is required to be both written and signed by the lessor if the lease period is for 6 months or more
- Now, California has some principles that guide the regulation of the real estate industry and according to the California Principles of Real State, it has to be said that leases of less than one year are not required to be in writing.
- Now, even though the law stated that the consent of both parties are not enough to bind themselves in the lease agreement, it is recommended that just for the sake of keeping things legally binding as regards the agreement between both parties, then both parties may state it in written and the lessor must sign it.
Read more about real estate statutes at; https://brainly.com/question/19655487