Respuesta :
Just take it in co-ordinate pairs
- (x,y)=(Arm span,Height)
Take two points
- (58,60)
- (41,40)
Slope:-
[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto m=\dfrac{40-60}{41-58}[/tex]
[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto m=\dfrac{-20}{-17}[/tex]
[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto m=\dfrac{20}{17}[/tex]
[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto m\approx 1.2[/tex]
Equation of line in point slope form
[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto y-y_1=m(x-x_1)[/tex]
[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto y-60=1.2(x-58)[/tex]
[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto y-60=1.2x-69.6[/tex]
[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto 1.2x-y-9.6=0[/tex]
- Convert to slope intercept form y=mx+b
[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto y=1.2x-9.6[/tex]
Graph attached

Answer:
Here's what I get.
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Representation of data
I used Excel to create a scatterplot of the data, draw the line of best fit, and print the regression equation.
2. Line of best fit
(a) Variables
I chose arm span as the dependent variable (y-axis) and height as the independent variable (x-axis).
It seems to me that arm span depends on your height rather than the other way around.
(b) Regression equation
The calculation is easy but tedious, so I asked Excel to do it.
For the equation y = ax + b, the formulas are
(DOWN BELOW)
This gave the regression equation:
y = 1.0595x - 4.1524
(c) Interpretation
The line shows how arm span depends on height.
The slope of the line says that arm span increases about 6 % faster than height.
The y-intercept is -4. If your height is zero, your arm length is -4 in (both are impossible).
(d) Residuals
The residuals appear to be evenly distributed above and below the predicted values.
A graph of all the residuals confirms this observation.
The equation usually predicts arm span to within 4 in.
(e) Predictions
(i) Height of person with 66 in arm span
(ii) Arm span of 74 in tall person


