An archaeologist discovers new evidence suggesting humans inhabited a particular area long before it was originally believed. Because these results are so novel, if the archaeologist is critically thinking, she should first:

Respuesta :

If an archaeologist is trying to validate new evidence, then he would have to show critical thinking so, she should:

  • C) Conduct additional tests on the evidence in an attempt to falsify her results

What is Critical Thinking?

This refers to the complex analysis of a set of data through the use of available data in order to make a conclusion.

With this in mind, we can see that if the archaeologist is trying to validate new evidence using critical thinking, then he would need to conduct additional tests to try and falsify her results.

Read more about critical thinking here:
https://brainly.com/question/6034421