contestada

You try to live strictly by the moral rules contained in your religion's moral code. The two most important rules are "Be merciful" (don't give people what they deserve) and "Be just" (give people exactly what they deserve). Now suppose a man is arrested for stealing food from your house, and the police leave it up to you whether he should be prosecuted for his crime or set free. Should you be merciful and set him free, or be just and make sure he is appropriately punished? How do you resolve this conflict of rules? Can your moral code resolve it? To what moral principles or theories do you appeal?

Respuesta :

jaquelinefvr

The punishment that the man must receive in the case of stealing the food from a house, must be based on the moral and ethical code of the society, being essential to analyze the case individually, for a more effective judgment.

Moral code

It is a set of rules and agreements established for the development of good practices and maintenance of society. It is correct to say that an attitude that leads to survival is seen as a moral action.

Therefore, stealing food can be considered an immoral action, based on the ethical theory of moral absolutism, which says that every action contains inherent values ​​of right or wrong, regardless of motivation.

Already based on the ethical theory of consequentialism, the consequences of an act must be taken into account when judging it as right or wrong.

In the US, what happens in this situation, therefore, is that if the theft is less than a value, the individual will be charged with misdemeanor for petty theft, and can be punished with fines and up to six months in prison.

Find out more information about moral code here:

https://brainly.com/question/1222107