contestada

Write a paragraph to explain what verdict you would reach if you were a member of the jury. Would you find the defendant guilty or not guilty of committing the crime?
Be sure to consider:
the evidence.
the prosecutor’s argument.
the defense lawyer’s argument.

Respuesta :

sandlee09

Although a description of the case was not provided for this question, we can confirm that as a member of the jury, when deciding guilt, you should hold the prosecution to the burden of proof.

What we know about the burden of proof.

  • In any criminal case, the prosecution carries the burden of proof.
  • The prosecution must prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • When acting as a member of the jury, you should hold your decision to this standard.
  • You should only vote guilty if there are no logical doubts present as to the arguments presented by the prosecution.

Therefore, we can confirm that when acting as a jury member, you should base your decision on the prosecution's ability to prove guilt beyond any reasonable doubt.

To learn more about criminal law visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1869780?referrer=searchResults

zoeyhozuki

Answer:

SAMLE RESPONSE: If I were a member of the jury, I would find the defendant not guilty. The prosecutor did not present enough evidence to prove that Mark Greene had committed the crime. The security camera footage does not show the thief’s face and the fingerprints on the bicycle do not belong to Mark.

Explanation:

Hope it helps <3

Otras preguntas