The antitrust policies of woodrow and roosevelt is different in that roosevelt wanted to improve the united states while woodrow intended to change it.
Antitrust are basically laws enacted to discourage market monopoly, in other words market shares and capitalisation is not expected to be focused towards a particular produce.
Moreso, the law frawns at too much of merger and aquision.
Learn more about Antitrust Policies here:
https://brainly.com/question/13800256
Antitrust laws are regulations that encourage competition by limiting the market power of any particular firm. This often involves ensuring that mergers and acquisitions don't overly concentrate market power or form monopolies, as well as breaking up firms that have become monopolies
Thesis: Roosevelt's New Nationalism program was in favor of regulated monopolies and trusts, among other things, while Wilson’s New Freedom program was in favor of unregulated and non monopolized markets, and it shunned social welfare proposals . The most reasonable of these two plans is obviously Roosevelt's, which sought to improve the US rather than change it completely.
