HURRY Help me for a brainlest! 100 points!
In the novel Persepolis name 3 violations of human rights, explain how it shows the violation, explain how the violation was in the book(what happened),

Respuesta :

Answer:

This is my mixture of previous two answers

PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST IF MY ANSWER IS CORRECT PLEASE

Explanation:

Title right of humans and it counterclaim

Can you think of a time in your life when you were treated unfairly but there was nothing you could do about it? What if one day your life changed forever and you were denied every right you ever thought you had. The violation of Human Rights is emphasized throughout Marjane Satrapi's Persepolis by giving detailed descriptions of how people were treated during the Iranian Revolution.

The new government that wanted to take over Iran was desperate to get rid of anyone who wanted to oppose them and they did not care what they had to do in order to accomplish this. One night, after Marjane has gone to bed, her parents discuss all of the horrible things that are happening and her father says, "They burned down the Rex Cinema tonight... The doors had been locked from the outside a few minutes before the fire... They forbade people to rescue those locked inside" (14). In the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it is stated in Article 3 that everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of a person.

The right of life was took away from over 400 people who were locked in the cinema. Security of a person was also taken from them because they were not allowed help from anyone outside. The right to liberty was denied to...show more content...

Marjane hears a family friend state, "You remember the day they pulled out my nails... They whipped me with thick electric cables... Not to mention putting out their cigarettes on our back and thighs...They burned me with an iron" (151). This quote states the tortures that only one person experienced.

The use by host States of counterclaims-while having a long pedigree in interstate litigation has since a couple of years gradually made its appearance in investment treaty arbitration. While such counterclaims have more often than not been unsuccessful, recent cases show that tribunals are increasingly spending more time discussing the merits of counterclaims. Also, recent cases have shown that counterclaims may provide an avenue for host States to bring human rights violations by the foreign investor under the jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal, an evolution that has not only been visible in the practice of investment tribu nals, but also in certain investment treaties which now explicitly provide for the possibility for States to bring counterclaims. In this article, I explore the legal framework for the use of counterclaims by host States for violations by the inves tor of human rights obligations. I first summarize the current state of affairs in relation to the human rights obligations of foreign investors. I then discuss the use and practice of counterelaims in investment treaty arbitration in general, and then analyse the possibility to use host State counterclaims to bring a human rights-based claim against foreign investors.

New generation treaties

10. The future success of a human rights counterclaim could be bound to human rights obligations imposed to the foreign investor. New generation treaties contain substantive provisions related to human rights obligations for corporations. For example, some of these provisions contain direct human rights obligations on foreign 22 investors, while others intend to consider human rights compliance of the foreign investor when deciding the amount of 23 compensation.

Theoretical background

2. International human rights law and international investment law are different areas of international law, but the interaction of these different areas of law is increasing.

3. Historically, investment treaties made no reference to human rights, even though at the time of their making, guarantees for the respect of human rights already existed in other international legal instruments. 1 These instruments do not contain direct human rights obligations for corporations. However, certain non-binding instruments are slowly providing for human rights obligations.