Largely, the Citizen United v FEC decision has weakened the United States' century-old electoral and political process that frowned at unlimited electoral campaign contributions.
In the Citizen United v FEC case, the Supreme Court upheld the First Amendment that prohibits the government from restricting political independent expenditures by corporations, associations, or labor unions.
By the court's decision, corporations and unions can spend unlimited money for "electioneering communications" and directly advocate for the election or defeat of candidates, without contributing directly to the individual candidate.
The court's ruling allowed unlimited election spending by corporations and labor unions, thus fueling the rise of Super PACs (Political Action Committees) which could swell election outcomes.
Thus, the Citizen United v FEC decision has weakened the United States' century-old electoral and political process that frowned at unlimited electoral campaign contributions.
Learn more about the Citizen United v FEC decision at https://brainly.com/question/10284765
#SPJ1