After a minor collision between a car and a truck, the driver of the car sued the trucker for negligence, claiming she had whiplash to her neck and was in a lot of pain. At trial, in cross-examination of the driver, the trucker's attorney asked whether the driver had sued another trucker 10 years ago, claiming injuries to her leg. The driver's attorney did not object to the question and the driver answered that she had been involved in an accident, but that she had not filed a lawsuit. The trucker's attorney calls the second trucker (of 10 years earlier), who is prepared to testify that the driver had sued him for damages from an alleged injury to her leg, but that the lawsuit was settled within a week.

Required:
Should the court rule that the second trucker's testimony is admissible?