Bill caused Aaron's damages (injuries) as, a piece of sharp steel from Bill's bush hog struck his left temple.
Because Aaron suffered serious injuries when a piece of sharp steel from Bill's bush hog struck his left temple. Aaron was hurt as a result of Bill's carelessness.
The easiest way to express cause-in-fact causation is as a "but-for" chain reaction: If the action had not been taken, the harm would not have happened.
The idea of proximate cause is more difficult to describe than cause-in-fact causation. If someone is hurt and they feel it was because of the other person's activities, they may wish to sue the other person for compensation for their losses, such as medical expenses or lost earnings.
To know more about injuries:
https://brainly.com/question/1699500
#SPJ4
