Please help me on this! I’m giving 100 brainly points. If you can detail it more for me to understand as well. I would appreciate it thanks!

Plessy v. Ferguson -1896 Document

Question:
3. "We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiff's argument to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority."- If you were a lawyer, how would you counter this argument?

Respuesta :

A lawyer will likely counter this argument by stating that there is no enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority.

What was the case of Plessy v. Ferguson?

The federal case stemmed from an 1892 incident in which African American train passenger Homer Plessy refused to sit in a car for Black people.

The ruling of the Supreme Court in this case upheld that the Louisiana state law allowed for "equal" but separate accommodations for the white and colored races."

The impact of this ruling was controversial because it set precedent that segregation was acceptable by law.

In conclusion, in this case, the lawyer will likely counter this argument by stating that there is no enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority.

Read more about Plessy v. Ferguson

brainly.com/question/24766692

#SPJ1