Obtaining forensic confirmation takes time. The CSI effect causes jurors to require more legal evidence than is accessible or necessary. Because of deceptive media, particularly TV portrayals, jurors have greater trust in forensic and DNA evidence than is necessary.
Society must spend more money to build additional research centers. This may help you achieve your goal faster.
As a society, we must also educate the youth so that future medical professionals aren't misled by sensationalized media coverage of crime.
DNA confirmation is more persuasive than witness testimony and is thus the most compelling kind of evidence for determining the suspect's guilt.
This is further explained below.
If you were a defense attorney, what would you want the jurors to know about the limits of forensic evidence?
Generally, It takes time to get forensic evidence to back up an accusation. Because of the CSI effect, juries often want more evidence than is reasonable or possible to provide. Television has contributed to overconfidence in forensic and DNA evidence among juries.
Greater societal investment in the construction of new centers for scientific study is required. It's possible that this will speed up your progress.
As a society, we also have a responsibility to inoculate the next generation against the dangers of being influenced by the tabloidization of crime.
In conclusion, DNA confirmation is the most convincing evidence because it is more convincing than witness testimony.
Read more about DNA
https://brainly.com/question/264225
#SPJ1
