Whether or not stealing is immoral or now not relies upon both the context of the action and the moral concept used. In utilitarianism, stealing would simplest be immoral if it ends in terrible results for the stakeholders.
For Kant, it would always be immoral, because it does not respect the autonomy of the sufferer. For distinctive feature ethics, we would have to recognize why the act becomes accomplished and whether or not the stealing is a valid expression of a distinctive feature.
For utilitarianism, which specializes in the entire benefit of an action, stealing might be morally proper if it will increase the whole gain or happiness for all stakeholders.
So, for instance, stealing a terrorist’s bomb earlier than he can detonate it would qualify as a morally right movement since it increases the total advantage or happiness. further, Robin Hood-like movements (stealing from the wealthy to provide for the terrible) might probably be considered proper.
Learn more about stealing here https://brainly.com/question/734074
#SPJ9
