The supreme courts decision was, According to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), the government cannot "substantially limit a person's exercise of religion" unless doing so is "in furtherance of a compelling governmental purpose; and is the least restrictive way of furthering that compelling governmental interest."
The Supreme Court ruled in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. that some for-profit, closely held business employers who assert a religious objection are exempt from the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) requirement that contraception be covered by their employee health plans.
Three secular, for-profit organizations and their owners are the plaintiffs in these (consolidated) cases. They are opposed to several forms of contraception due to their religious—albeit false—belief that they are abortifacients. Under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA), a federal law, and the U.S. Constitution, the corporations sued, requesting that the court permit them to omit contraceptive coverage from their employee health plans.
To learn more about supreme court visit the link:
https://brainly.com/question/10739091?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
